Ibn Taymiyya (Salafis/Wahhabis) vs The Prophets Alayhum Salaam, Khulafa ar-Rashideen, Sahaba and AwliyahAllah
Ibn Taymiyyah could not appreciate the superiority of Ahlus Sunnah Wa'l Jama'ah scholars. He denied Tasawwuf (Sufism) and, therefore, deviated from Ahlus Sunnah Wa'l Jama'ah. His books are sources for opponents of the four Madhabs who call themselves Salafis/Wahhabis.
He foolishly raised objections to Maturidi and Ash'ari scholars and especially to the Rightly Guided Caliphs,
The ideas of Ibn Taymiyya are worthless. He was misguided and misguiding Muslims. He deviated from the consensus of Muslims and took a heretical path.
In his book al-Abudiyyat, he says that making Dhikr of Allah's name is innovation and heresy, and he made vicious slanders on Sunni Sufi masters. He attacked Sufi masters, such as Hadrat Sadraddin al-Konawi and Shaykh Ibn Arabi and said, “The books of Imam al-Ghazali are full of fabricated Hadiths.”
Kitabul Arsh is one of his most awful books. There were scholars who said that a person who addressed him as Shaykh ul-Islam would become a disbeliever.
“Allah sits on the Arsh, and He leaves space for His Messenger to sit next to Him. Allah descends from the sky to the earth just as I am descending now” In his book As-Sirat-ul-Mustaqim.
Ibn Taymiyyah‟s and Priest Luther‟s aims were identical. Whereas the Christian reformer was successful, the reformer of Islam was unsuccessful.”
Ibn Taymiyyah said, “It is not necessary to make up Qada Salats.”
He objected to one's visiting the blessed grave of our Master the Prophet and those of the Companions, the Awliya‟, scholars, and pious Muslims. He considered it haram to use them as a means for intercession.
Abu Bakr as-Siddiq RadiAllahu Anh had declared Islam in his old age.
Umar ibn al-Khattab was a of bid‘ati, and made a lot of mistakes,” Ibn Taymiyyya objected to the Hadith that says “Allah has put the true word on the tongue of Umar.”
Uthman ibn Affan RadiAllahu Anh loved money (Money Hungry), had excessive love for wealth.
Ali ibn Abi Talib RadiAllahu Anh made mistakes in 17 different matters, Ali's iman was not valid because he was a child when he believed. He had declared Islam as a boy, and the boy‘s Islam is not considered sound. In sum he said ugly things such as these, and it was said against him that he was a hypocrite, in view of the Prophet SallAllahu Alayhi Wa Salaam saying (to Ali); ''None but a hypocrite has hatred for you.'' Ibn Taymiyya said; Ali namely, that he had been forsaken everywhere he went, had repeatedly tried to acquire the caliphate and never attained it, fought out of lust for power rather than religion.
He declared some notable companions, such as Ibn Abbas RadiAllahu Anh disbelievers.
He spoke ill of the great ones of the Companions and said “It is haram to set out on a journey to visit the grave of the Messenger of Allah SallAllahu Alayhi Wa Salaam.
Ibn Taymiyya denied the immunity of Prophets Alayhum Salaam from sins. However, it is one of the attributes of prophets.
He objected to one's visiting the blessed grave of the Companions, the Awliya, scholars, and pious Muslims. He considered it Haraam to use them as a means for intercession.
An you still wonder who are on the true patch ?
Todays people with zero knowledge about the Qur'an and Sunnah have started giving out absurd Fatwas and there by misleading the Muslim Ummah. They are joining forces and accepting the kufr and misguidance of the deviant sects, such as the Wahhabis, Deos, Shi'i (Sullah Qullis), they are destroying 1400 years of scholarship to promote misguidance and Kufr!
A question for the deviant sects..
''There will always be a group of my Ummah who are apparent on the Truth (Haq), unabated by those who fail or oppose them, until the (Last) Hour commences.'' Ahlus Sunnah (Sunni Maturidis/Ash'aris) asks the deviants like the Wahhabis Salafis Deobandis Qadiyanis Shi'i and other minded sects explain your existence?
Your opinions and narrations goes back to your ill school of thought to your scholar from 700AH and 2-300 years back, while Ahlus Sunnah wa'l Jama'ah chain of narration goes back to the Sahaba Ridwanullah Alayhhum Ajmaeen, the Salaf us-Saliheen!!!
[Fatawa al-Hadtiyyah, Jawhar al-Munzam, Tuhfat un-Nuzzar, Kamul Muarid, ad-Durar al-Kamina, Tabakat al-Kubra, Zahirat al-Fiqhil al-Kubra]
Ibn Taymiyyah could not appreciate the superiority of Ahlus Sunnah Wa'l Jama'ah scholars. He denied Tasawwuf (Sufism) and, therefore, deviated from Ahlus Sunnah Wa'l Jama'ah. His books are sources for opponents of the four Madhabs who call themselves Salafis/Wahhabis.
He foolishly raised objections to Maturidi and Ash'ari scholars and especially to the Rightly Guided Caliphs,
The ideas of Ibn Taymiyya are worthless. He was misguided and misguiding Muslims. He deviated from the consensus of Muslims and took a heretical path.
In his book al-Abudiyyat, he says that making Dhikr of Allah's name is innovation and heresy, and he made vicious slanders on Sunni Sufi masters. He attacked Sufi masters, such as Hadrat Sadraddin al-Konawi and Shaykh Ibn Arabi and said, “The books of Imam al-Ghazali are full of fabricated Hadiths.”
Kitabul Arsh is one of his most awful books. There were scholars who said that a person who addressed him as Shaykh ul-Islam would become a disbeliever.
“Allah sits on the Arsh, and He leaves space for His Messenger to sit next to Him. Allah descends from the sky to the earth just as I am descending now” In his book As-Sirat-ul-Mustaqim.
Ibn Taymiyyah‟s and Priest Luther‟s aims were identical. Whereas the Christian reformer was successful, the reformer of Islam was unsuccessful.”
Ibn Taymiyyah said, “It is not necessary to make up Qada Salats.”
He objected to one's visiting the blessed grave of our Master the Prophet and those of the Companions, the Awliya‟, scholars, and pious Muslims. He considered it haram to use them as a means for intercession.
Abu Bakr as-Siddiq RadiAllahu Anh had declared Islam in his old age.
Umar ibn al-Khattab was a of bid‘ati, and made a lot of mistakes,” Ibn Taymiyyya objected to the Hadith that says “Allah has put the true word on the tongue of Umar.”
Uthman ibn Affan RadiAllahu Anh loved money (Money Hungry), had excessive love for wealth.
Ali ibn Abi Talib RadiAllahu Anh made mistakes in 17 different matters, Ali's iman was not valid because he was a child when he believed. He had declared Islam as a boy, and the boy‘s Islam is not considered sound. In sum he said ugly things such as these, and it was said against him that he was a hypocrite, in view of the Prophet SallAllahu Alayhi Wa Salaam saying (to Ali); ''None but a hypocrite has hatred for you.'' Ibn Taymiyya said; Ali namely, that he had been forsaken everywhere he went, had repeatedly tried to acquire the caliphate and never attained it, fought out of lust for power rather than religion.
He declared some notable companions, such as Ibn Abbas RadiAllahu Anh disbelievers.
He spoke ill of the great ones of the Companions and said “It is haram to set out on a journey to visit the grave of the Messenger of Allah SallAllahu Alayhi Wa Salaam.
Ibn Taymiyya denied the immunity of Prophets Alayhum Salaam from sins. However, it is one of the attributes of prophets.
He objected to one's visiting the blessed grave of the Companions, the Awliya, scholars, and pious Muslims. He considered it Haraam to use them as a means for intercession.
An you still wonder who are on the true patch ?
Todays people with zero knowledge about the Qur'an and Sunnah have started giving out absurd Fatwas and there by misleading the Muslim Ummah. They are joining forces and accepting the kufr and misguidance of the deviant sects, such as the Wahhabis, Deos, Shi'i (Sullah Qullis), they are destroying 1400 years of scholarship to promote misguidance and Kufr!
A question for the deviant sects..
''There will always be a group of my Ummah who are apparent on the Truth (Haq), unabated by those who fail or oppose them, until the (Last) Hour commences.'' Ahlus Sunnah (Sunni Maturidis/Ash'aris) asks the deviants like the Wahhabis Salafis Deobandis Qadiyanis Shi'i and other minded sects explain your existence?
Your opinions and narrations goes back to your ill school of thought to your scholar from 700AH and 2-300 years back, while Ahlus Sunnah wa'l Jama'ah chain of narration goes back to the Sahaba Ridwanullah Alayhhum Ajmaeen, the Salaf us-Saliheen!!!
[Fatawa al-Hadtiyyah, Jawhar al-Munzam, Tuhfat un-Nuzzar, Kamul Muarid, ad-Durar al-Kamina, Tabakat al-Kubra, Zahirat al-Fiqhil al-Kubra]
No comments:
Post a Comment